Choosing between traditional publishing vs self publishing in India can be a significant choice for any Indian author. There is no one-size-fits-all answer, because the ideal route of action in your case goes down to your objectives, abilities, and the type of book you wrote. Here are the main distinctions that can guide you through this crucial choice and enable you to make the most suitable publishing decision in your writing journey.
When people imagine a book being published, they are thinking of traditional publishing. You get your book published through a publishing house, such as Penguin Random House or HarperCollins India. They do everything from editing, design, printing, and distribution.
The process is generally long and challenging. An author first needs to find a literary agent who will then pitch the manuscript to different publishers. If a publisher accepts the book, they buy the rights to it and give the author an advance payment. This advance is the money that the author gets, but they only start earning profits after the book has sold enough copies.
Let us now understand what the main pros and cons of self publishing and traditional publishing are.
self publishing refers to the fact that you are both the author as well as the publisher. You go through the whole process, from preparing your book all the way to selling it. Various sites, such as Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP), have made this style extremely popular, particularly among Indian authors publishing guides and new writers.
When it comes to self publishing, you do it your way. You get your own editor, cover designer, and formatter. After that, you publish your book on a site that does the printing as well as the distribution of the book. The important point is just that you pay it all up front; however, you also get a much bigger portion of the profit.
The choice between traditional publishing vs self publishing in India depends entirely on your personal goals as a writer.
The publishing landscape of Indian authors publishing guides has changed, and there are numerous success stories both ways. Some authors go even further and adopt a hybrid strategy, with some traditionally published volumes and others self-published. After all, there is simply no wrong or right choice, as long as this contributes to your success as a writer, you have picked the right route.
The main difference is who pays for the book and who controls the process. In traditional publishing vs self publishing, the publisher pays all the costs and manages the process, while in self publishing, the author pays all costs and manages everything.
Yes, it can be very competitive. The number of authors who submit manuscripts is much higher than the number of books a publisher can take on. This is why many Indian authors publishing guides and resources often recommend both paths.
With traditional publishing, you get an advance and lower royalties, but the publisher covers all costs. With self publishing, you pay all the costs upfront but earn much higher royalties, sometimes up to 70% of the book's price.
The answer to this question, which is better, traditional publishing vs self publishing in India, is that self publishing is undoubtedly better for creative control. You have the final say on the cover, title, content, and pricing. In traditional publishing, the publisher has the final say.
The main pros and cons of self publishing are: The pros of self publishing include full creative control, higher royalties, and a faster timeline. The cons are that you have to pay upfront costs and are fully responsible for all marketing efforts.
Yes! Many self-published authors who have a successful book and a good sales record are often approached by traditional publishers for their next book. There can be a choice between traditional publishing vs self publishing in India, a stepping stone rather than a final decision.
While not all publishers require an agent, having one is a huge advantage. They have connections and can help you navigate the complex process of getting a deal.
Marketing is crucial for both, but it's completely your responsibility in self publishing. In traditional publishing, the publisher handles some of it, but authors are still expected to be very involved in promoting their own book.
The answer to this question, which is better, traditional publishing vs self publishing in India, is that traditional publishing gives you a much better chance. It's very difficult for a self-published book to get wide placement in physical stores.
Absolutely. A self-published book with strong sales is a powerful demonstration that you have a market and an audience. This can make you a very attractive prospect for traditional publishers and influence your choice between traditional publishing vs self publishing in India for your long-term career.